Quick answer
Typography is most of logo design: strip the icons away and the majority of strong identities are essentially a well-chosen, well-set typeface with deliberate customisation. The typeface family sets the personality before a single word is read — serif for heritage and authority, geometric sans for modern competence, slab for solidity, script for craft and warmth — and the two decisions that separate professional work from a font menu pick are customisation (even one altered letterform makes it yours) and licensing (the trap that catches DIY logos years later).
What each family signals
| Family | Signals | Suits | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serif (traditional) | Heritage, authority, trust | Law, finance, property, heritage brands | Stuffy if the brand is young and casual |
| Modern/high-contrast serif | Elegance, premium, editorial | Salons, weddings, interiors, fashion | Fine strokes die in embroidery and small sizes |
| Geometric sans | Modern, efficient, tech-adjacent | Startups, trades wanting a crisp look, software | The 2020s default — needs customisation to be distinctive |
| Humanist sans | Friendly, approachable, clear | Healthcare, services, community businesses | Can read generic without strong colour/layout |
| Slab serif | Solid, industrial, dependable | Builders, manufacturing, coffee, outdoor brands | Heavy at small sizes if tightly spaced |
| Script/handwritten | Craft, warmth, personal touch | Bakeries, florists, photographers, artisans | Legibility at distance and 48px avatars — the classic failure |
| Display/decorative | Loud personality | One-location hospitality, events | Dates fastest of all; never for the whole lockup |
The test that matters isn’t “do I like it” but “does it say what the business needs said” — a £400/day joiner in a spindly script and an artisan cake maker in industrial slab are both wearing the wrong clothes. This is the same intent-first logic as the rest of the identity; the wider principles are in what makes a good logo.
The licensing trap
Fonts are licensed software, and the licence that came with your design tool often does not cover use as a logo. The specific traps: desktop licences that exclude logo/trademark use, “free” fonts that are free for personal use only, and webfont licences that don’t cover print. The consequences surface at the worst times — a trademark filing, a franchise deal, a cease-and-desist. The professional standard: open-licence faces (SIL OFL — most of Google Fonts) are safe for logo use; commercial faces need the logo/branding permission checked; and the cleanest answer of all is customised or redrawn letterforms, which is what you’re partly paying for in professional work. If a designer hands over a logo, the font licensing position should be stated in the handover — alongside the ownership questions covered in who owns your logo.
Customisation: the difference between typing and designing
Set your business name in a nice typeface and you have… your name in a typeface anyone can type. Professional wordmarks earn distinctiveness through deliberate moves: adjusted letterspacing and weights, a modified terminal or joined ligature, a letterform that quietly carries the trade (the pipe in a plumber’s L, the roofline in a builder’s A), consistent geometry matched to an accompanying mark. One well-judged alteration is often enough — it’s the difference between “set in Montserrat” and “that’s their logo”, and it’s why two logos using the same underlying face can be worlds apart. It’s also trademark-relevant: customised letterforms are more defensible than a plain dictionary word in an unmodified font.
Pairing: the two-font rule
A logo lockup usually needs at most two faces: the name, and a small supporting line (est. date, trade descriptor, town). The reliable pattern is contrast-with-harmony — a distinctive name face plus a quiet workhorse for the support line (never two similar-but-different faces, which reads as a mistake). Whatever pairing the logo uses then extends to the whole identity: website headings, letterhead, van, social templates. Typography consistency across those surfaces does more for looking established than any individual design choice — it’s the system logic that runs through our brand identity work.
Practical tests before committing
- The 48px test: screenshot the name at avatar size. Scripts and fine serifs usually fail here first — relevant because square crops are where wordmarks struggle.
- The one-colour test: pure black on white. If it needs colour or gradients to hold together, the letterforms aren’t doing the work.
- The embroidery test: any stroke thinner than ~1mm at chest-logo size will vanish in thread.
- The neighbour test: put it next to three competitors. If you swapped names, would anyone notice? If not, customise further.
Font choice is one decision inside a larger process — where it sits in the sequence, and what you should receive at the end, is covered in the logo design process, and it’s all part of the standard scope in our logo design service.
The same name at seven sizes
A typeface does not behave the same way at 16 pixels and at three metres, which is why a wordmark is never really one drawing. Type set for a business card looks loose on a van; type spaced for a van looks cramped on a card. Professional practice is to decide what changes at each size and write it down, so nobody has to improvise later.
| Surface | Rough size of the name | What the type needs there |
|---|---|---|
| Favicon / app icon | 16–64px | Usually initials or a mark only — full names do not survive here |
| Social avatar | ~110–170px square | Shortened lockup, heavier weight, generous tracking |
| Business card | 25–45mm wide | The reference setting; everything else is a deviation from this |
| Embroidered chest logo | 60–90mm wide | Strokes no finer than roughly 1mm at final size; tight counters fill in with thread |
| Quote and invoice header | 40–60mm wide | Must remain legible after a customer prints it on a home printer |
| Van side | 400–900mm wide | Slightly tighter tracking than the card setting; heavy weights can look bloated at scale |
| Site board or fascia | 1m+ | Read from distance and at an angle — simplest possible letterforms win |
Two working rules come out of that table. Small sizes want more space between letters and slightly more weight; large sizes want less space and, often, slightly less weight than instinct suggests. And anything that has to be cut, stitched or etched sets the floor for the whole design, because those processes cannot reproduce what a screen renders happily. Getting the optical adjustments right at each size is a large part of the difference in outcome described in what you are actually paying for in a more expensive logo — the cheap version is one drawing, exported at different scales.
Setting a name you cannot change
Most typographic problems in small-business logos are name problems the designer inherited. Common ones, and what to do about them:
- Long names. Anything over about fourteen characters starts fighting every horizontal space it is put in. The fix is a stacked lockup — two lines, aligned to a common width — designed at the same time as the single-line version rather than improvised later.
- Ampersands and “and”. “Hughes & Son” hangs on the quality of one character, and ampersands vary wildly between faces. Some are the best letter in the family and worth building the mark around; some are a mess and should be replaced with a smaller “and” or a stacked arrangement.
- Apostrophes and hyphens. O’Brien, Nolan’s, Shaw-Baker. These interrupt letter rhythm and get lost at small sizes. Sometimes the honest answer is to drop the punctuation in the mark while keeping it in the legal name.
- Ltd, Limited and legal suffixes. They belong on invoices and letterheads, not usually inside the logo, where they add length and formality without adding recognition.
- Awkward letter pairs. A capital A next to a capital V, an r beside an n that reads as an m, a double L that creates a visual gap. These are kerning jobs, not font-choice jobs, and they are exactly what “custom-set” means.
- Descender collisions. A name with a descending letter in the middle constrains where a supporting line or icon can sit. Notice it early and the lockup designs itself around it.
If the business is not yet trading, this cuts the other way: the typographic awkwardness of a name is a legitimate factor when choosing it, alongside the domain and trade mark checks set out in choosing a UK business name. Short, unambiguous, no punctuation, no numbers spelled two ways — names like that are cheaper to brand and easier to say down a phone.
Faces to avoid, and why
Not a snobbery list — a practical one. Novelty faces with strong cultural baggage carry meanings you cannot control, and a customer’s association with the font arrives before your business does. Ultra-light and hairline weights fail at almost every physical size, so they are a screen-only choice pretending to be an identity. Heavily distressed or “hand-grunge” faces contradict any trade selling precision, and they clog when reproduced small. Faces bundled by default with design tools appear on thousands of competitor logos, which is not fatal but demands customisation to earn distinctiveness. All-caps scripts are close to unreadable, since script letterforms are drawn to connect in lower case. And condensed faces set tightly are the single most common cause of illegible van livery, because the counters close up at exactly the distance you needed them to open.
The underlying principle is that a typeface should be doing one job you can name. If the answer to “why this one?” is “it looked nice in the list”, that is a decision waiting to be made properly.
The handover: what a finished wordmark contains
Font choice ends at the handover, and this is where DIY logos quietly fail years later. A properly delivered wordmark has the type converted to outlines, so the file no longer depends on the font being installed anywhere. That single step prevents the classic disaster where a printer or a new designer opens the artwork, the font substitutes, and a subtly wrong logo goes onto 500 items before anyone notices. It also means all your kerning and spacing adjustments are permanent rather than reconstructed.
Alongside outlined vectors, the handover should record the typeface names and licences held, so future materials — website headings, signage, documents — can be set in the same faces without guesswork, and so nobody re-buys a licence you already own. Ask for the supporting fonts to be specified as a short type stack for web use as well. Anything heading to a printer needs the outlining plus correct colour setup, which is standard scope in a print-ready artwork handover. Then write down the minimum sizes and clear space so the rules survive the person who commissioned them, which is the whole subject of using your logo properly.
Get the UK Branding Cost Calculator (free)
A 1-page worksheet that estimates what your business should realistically spend on branding based on revenue stage, sector and timeline.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time. UK GDPR compliant — your email is only used to send this resource.
Sources & Further Reading
- Typography Knowledge — Google Fonts
- SIL Open Font License — SIL International
- Trade Mark Registration — GOV.UK / IPO
Frequently asked questions
What is the best font for a logo? +
The one that says what the business needs said: traditional serifs for authority and heritage, geometric sans for modern competence, slabs for solidity, scripts for craft and warmth. There is no universally best face — there is matching the signal to the trade, then customising so it becomes yours.
Can I legally use any font in my logo? +
No — fonts are licensed software, and many desktop or free-for-personal-use licences exclude logo and trademark use. SIL Open Font License faces (most of Google Fonts) are safe; commercial faces need their branding permissions checked. Customised or redrawn letterforms are the cleanest position.
How many fonts should a logo use? +
At most two: a distinctive face for the name and a quiet supporting face for a small secondary line (trade descriptor, established date). Two similar-but-different faces read as an error; strong contrast with shared proportions reads as design.
Should I use a script font for my logo? +
Only if warmth and craft are the message AND it survives the practical tests: legible at 48px avatar size, at distance on signage, and in embroidery (strokes above ~1mm). Most script logo failures are legibility failures — a script name with a clean sans support line is the usual compromise.
Why do designers customise fonts in logos? +
Because an unmodified typeface is something anyone can type. Adjusted spacing, a modified letterform or an integrated trade cue makes the wordmark distinctive, more memorable and more defensible as a trademark. One deliberate alteration is often the difference between "text" and "logo".